For our purposes, conflict resolution (CR) refers to resolution, transformation, mitigation, management and prevention. And there are a number of strategies that people use to achieve this.
First there are
disappearance strategies, where the conflict seems to go away through
voluntary (extinction, renunciation) or
involuntary (forgetfulness, evaporation) mechanisms.
Domination strategies also fit into two categories,
imposition (allocation, adjudication) and
submission (surrender, deterrence). Then there are
agreement strategies: by
trial (contest, lottery) or by
deliberation (negotiation, mediation).
But discussing histories of conflict and its resolution is about more than facts, dates and strategies – it comes down to the nature of
how we view history itself. It's often written by the victors, and so recovering the voice of different sides can challenge our interpretation of the facts. And so emerge issues of truth and validity, or problems of interpretation or anachronisms.
That's all Jean-François will be getting into today, but he states his commitment to an approach that's broad, multidimensional, non-deterministic and non-relativist. And we start, next week, with a discussion of
archaic civilizations and hunter-gatherer societies. Then slowly make our way back to today.